Letter to the Editor: Total communication
Sir,—Having worked among and with the deaf for more than 30 years, and currently president of the New Zealand Association of the Deaf, I feel for and love the deaf very dearly. Totally ignored in New Zealand (the supposed “welfare state”), the battle for total communication in education for the deaf is a very real one. Miss Nola Dickey is to be championed for her endeavours and progress in the classroom, as is Dr Jim Moody of Dunedin.
While oralism is accepted by the NZAD as one method, the support of total communication is necessary to achieve a language. To express a personal opinion, lip-reading as a means of communication is a fallacy unless accompanied by other methods. Not mentioned anywhere in the battle for teaching total communication is the use of “body language” and facial expressions.
The adult deaf person in society within New Zealand today is either very very good or plain awful. If the teachers of oralism were faced with communication with those born profoundly deaf (and there are many who are unable to read or write, let alone communicate) in the difficult areas of court work, legal, medical and psychiatric situations, their defence of total oralism would collapse.
...
- Sign Language
- TV/Media







